Nostalgia is everywhere. Only mascots get to keep it.
Dunkin' rented the '90s for 60 seconds. Kellogg's put a tiger on Spotify forever.
Super Bowl 2026 was a nostalgia contest. Xfinity brought back Jurassic Park with de-aged versions of Sam Neill, Laura Dern, and Jeff Goldblum. Dunkin’ built a fake ‘90s sitcom pilot starring Ben Affleck, Jennifer Aniston, Matt LeBlanc, Jason Alexander, Ted Danson, and half the cast of ‘90s television. Both ads were expensive, clever, and engineered to make you feel warm inside.
And both will be forgotten by March.
Not because they were bad. They were genuinely entertaining. But because they were built on rented territory. Xfinity doesn’t own Jurassic Park (well, Comcast owns Universal, but you get my point). Dunkin’ doesn’t own Friends or Seinfeld or Good Will Hunting. The moment those licensing deals end, the nostalgia walks out the door with them.
Now compare that to what Kellogg’s did with Tony the Tiger.
The tiger that lives on Spotify now
Frosted Flakes partnered with Grammy-nominated rapper JID to remix their ‘90s “Hey Tony” jingle into a full-length track. It’s on Spotify. On Apple Music. In people’s playlists next to actual music, not sandwiched between commercial breaks.
JID grew up eating Frosted Flakes. The lyrics reference his childhood. It’s nostalgic, sure. But it’s nostalgic through a character that Kellogg’s has owned since 1952.
And this is just the latest move in Tony’s multi-front comeback. He became a VTuber on Twitch in 2022. He’s on TikTok. He sponsors the Sun Bowl (five consecutive years). He reunited with Tony Hawk for the Pro Skater 3+4 remake, complete with “Tony x Tony” cereal packs. That’s not a campaign. That’s a character operating across streaming, gaming, live events, merch, and culture simultaneously.
Dunkin’ spent millions assembling ‘90s sitcom stars for 60 seconds of airtime. Kellogg’s put a rapper on a 73-year-old tiger’s jingle and now owns a track on Spotify forever.
Marcel says: “One of these is a firework. The other is compound interest. I know which one I’d rather be.”
Renting nostalgia vs. owning it
This isn’t a knock on Xfinity or Dunkin’. Their Super Bowl spots were objectively fun. The Dunkin’ ad had people rewatching it frame by frame to catch all the sitcom references. The Xfinity spot generated massive conversation, even if most of it was about the uncanny valley de-aging (some critics compared it to a death mask).
But there’s a structural difference between what these brands did and what the mascot brands are doing right now.
When you build a nostalgia campaign around licensed IP or celebrity casting, you’re renting emotion. The warm feeling belongs to Jurassic Park, not Xfinity. To Good Will Hunting and Friends, not Dunkin’. When the campaign ends, you start from zero again next year. Dunkin’ knows this, which is why Affleck is now in his fourth consecutive Super Bowl spot for them. They’re essentially trying to turn a celebrity into a recurring character because they don’t have one.
Now, some brands can lean on their own heritage. Harley Davidson, Coca Cola or Guiness don’t need to license any nostalgic IP, they have their own nostalgia triggers. But those are brands with decades (sometimes over a century) of cultural presence baked in. That’s the exception, not the playbook. Most brands aren’t old enough or iconic enough to be their own nostalgia trigger.
Characters shortcut that problem. When you build a nostalgia campaign around an owned character, you’re depositing into an account that compounds. Every activation adds another layer of memory. Every remix, every collab, every merch drop builds on top of decades of existing mental availability.
The data backs this up. Kantar found that nostalgic ads increase enjoyability by 15 points and distinctiveness by 14 points. But here’s what matters for the ownership argument: characters already outperform celebrities in long-term brand equity. Stack nostalgia on top of an owned character, and you’re combining two of the most powerful forces in marketing.
The mascots you thought were dead just became the most valuable assets in marketing
Tony isn’t an isolated case. 2025 might go down as the year brands collectively realized they’d been sitting on gold mines.
Cornelius the Cockerel
Kellogg’s dropped £12 million on upgrading their 66-year-old rooster from flat illustration to full 3D animation by Framestore (Paddington, Harry Potter). System1 scored the ad at 3.8 stars, above the cereal category average. The brand admitted they’d “lost their way.” Their fix wasn’t a new campaign or celebrity deal. It was investing in the character they’d had since 1957.
The payoff? Cornelius got promoted from Corn Flakes mascot to masterbrand character across all Kellogg’s cereals.
Pillsbury Doughboy
AdWeek’s standout brand mascot of 2025. At 60 years old, he got a modern makeover, a 25-foot inflatable in Brooklyn, an AR “Doughhouse” experience, a Jimmy Fallon collab, and a reissue of the 1988 cookie jar that sold out in 24 hours.
General Mills reported more social engagement in Q1 than in all of fiscal 2025. Their VP called the Doughboy “Pillsbury’s strongest asset.” Not their recipes. Not their distribution. Their character.
Marcel says: “A 60-year-old piece of dough with a belly you can poke is outperforming entire social media teams. Think about that.”
And they’re not alone
Tootsie Roll refreshed the “How Many Licks?” commercial for the first time in 55 years, redrawn in HD, same storyline, same Mr. Owl. Cheez-It un-retired Prince Cheddward. Domino’s launched Mac Scott and gained 10,000 followers in a day. Aldi UK’s Kevin the Carrot married his sweetheart Katie after nearly a decade of storyline. And the Instacart Super Bowl spot crammed the Green Giant, Chester Cheetah, Kool-Aid Man, Pillsbury Doughboy, Energizer Bunny, and Mr. Clean into one ad, because every one of those characters already lives in our heads rent-free.
Everywhere you look, characters are coming off the bench.
Why now?
Nostalgia is the dominant emotional strategy in marketing right now, and the numbers explain why.
Nielsen says 61% of millennials say nostalgia improves their brand perception. 68% of Gen Z responds positively to throwback marketing even for eras they never lived through. In uncertain times, people reach for the familiar.
But nostalgia alone doesn’t explain why everyone’s specifically dusting off their mascots. Two things do.
Control. When you build campaigns around celebrities or licensed IP, you’re at the mercy of someone else’s reputation, availability, and price tag. Characters are your IP. You control the narrative, the scheduling, the evolution, and the cost. No contract renegotiations. No reputational risk you didn’t choose. No competing endorsements. That level of creative control becomes increasingly valuable when the cultural landscape is unpredictable.
AI is making distinctiveness the only moat. When anyone can generate a month’s worth of social content in an afternoon, the brands with recognizable, owned characters cut through the noise at thumbnail size. The same AI abundance that makes production cheap makes established characters more valuable, not less. Characters are up to 15x more memorable than logos. They consistently outperform celebrities in brand recognition and correct attribution. And they compound over time instead of expiring after a campaign cycle.
Marcel says: “I’ve been saying this for two years and people thought I was biased because I’m a mascot. Turns out all these billion-dollar companies agree with me.”
The playbook
Looking across these revivals, there’s a shared pattern.
Visual upgrade, personality preserved. Cornelius went from flat to 3D. The Doughboy got a wardrobe refresh. Mr. Owl got HD. In every case, they changed the resolution, not the character.
Culture collaborations rooted in authenticity. Tony x JID works because JID genuinely grew up with Frosted Flakes. Tony x Tony Hawk works because they share ‘90s commercial history. These aren’t random celebrity pairings.
Platform expansion beyond advertising. The JID track lives on Spotify, not in a TV spot. Tony is a VTuber. The Doughboy has an AR experience. The best revivals put the character where audiences already are.
Physical artifacts that extend the memory. The Pillsbury cookie jar sold out in 24 hours. Kellogg’s put “The OG” on billboards. Physical touchpoints extend the character beyond screens and into people’s homes.
What this means for you
If you have a mascot collecting dust somewhere in your brand guidelines, this is your wake-up call. You’re sitting on an asset that’s worth more now than when you created it. The brands winning aren’t inventing new characters (though some are). They’re investing in the ones they already have.
If you don’t have a character yet? Every brand that revived a mascot this year wished they’d never shelved it. Kellogg’s literally said they “lost their way.” Pillsbury called the Doughboy their “strongest asset” after years of underinvestment.
The best time to build a character was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
Celebrity nostalgia is a firework. Character nostalgia is compound interest.
Choose wisely.
Want to build your brand universe?
I help brands create character-driven engines powered by AI.
→ Book a 20-minute call | See examples
If you’re not subscribed yet, join 4,300+ marketers getting weekly mascot case studies and frameworks: